This Week’s Bit of String: A cat in a bin
A few years ago, a man couldn’t find his cat. Luckily, he’d rigged CCTV outside his house, and he found that a woman passing by had stroked the cat, then picked it up and put it in his wheelie bin.
The outraged owner shared the video in a quest to identify this dastardly villainess. Once named, the woman received death threats from every corner of this United Kingdom.
Turned out the woman had been walking home from visiting her dying father. She always said, ‘I just didn’t know what I was thinking.’
It doesn’t bear thinking about what could have happened if the cat’s owner wasn’t hooked on surveillance. But we all do bad things. We just don’t get CCTVed doing them. Would we want our entire lives judged by a misdeed that took a few seconds?
Following the Thread
Operating on that principal question, I began a short story back in 2011 about an upstanding man who, under stress, does something misconstrued as animal cruelty. But I never finished it.
It wasn’t suited to be a short story because there were too many questions. How did the disgraced culprit cope with the aftermath, and how did it affect his family? What about the person who publicised the transgression; did they regret provoking such bad will?
Last year I snowflaked it into a novel using this story planning technique, and wrote a draft in six months. So this particular Bit of String, when I pulled at it, revealed not a 2000-word competition entry, but an intricately plaited novel that I will edit and query this summer: The Wrong Ten Seconds.
Differences of Dimension: Length and Depth
I conducted a little Twitter poll this week to see what some of my fellow writers prefer: writing flash fiction, short stories or novels. The answer was resoundingly in favour of novels, with writers commenting that they enjoy fostering the ‘depth of character’ a novel requires (thanks to Libbie Toler), and the ‘total immersion in both the world and the plot.’ (Thanks to Donna Migliaccio.) I prefer novels myself, because I can let my characters go a little more. And they’re just easier.
A Writer’s Digest article on the difference between the two fictional forms proposes a test of theme: ‘If you feel your story will be more a journey than a statement, you may be leaning toward a novel.’ I suppose that when I started my short story version of The Wrong Ten Seconds, I was trying to make a statement. But that then inspired me to accompany the characters on their journey, so it became a novel.
Differences of Possibility
In current literary culture, it’s not fashionable to use writing to make statements. We’re supposed to show, not tell, aren’t we? That’s what makes short stories so difficult. Convey an idea, but don’t preach. Create sympathetic characters in very few pages. The advantage of writing a short story, perhaps, is some freedom in the ending. As Chris Power wrote for The Guardian, ‘Novelists are expected to tie up loose ends, whereas the short story writer can make a virtue of ambiguity.’
To me, that is the defining reason that makes an idea a short story rather than a novel. How much do I want to know about the end? It comes back to the What Ifs. When there’s a single central question, and I can’t bear to probe too far, I write a short story. Cowardly, isn’t it? While I find short stories artistically more challenging, emotionally I can stop them from taxing me as much as novels do. I didn’t need to decide, for example, what ultimately happened to Hannah and her son Jack in ‘The Apocalypse Alphabet.’ The statement was already made.
Differences of Literary Elements?
Short stories are more difficult for some of us because they still require all the ingredients of a novel. Plot, character, message, setting; they must be there, but condensed. It’s like these two photos: each picture has the same things in them—water, rocks, a person/ people—but one is close-up. That’s the short story, see. And because it’s zoomed in, those elements have to be damn near flawless.
Thanks to condensing those literary elements, the short story packs a powerful jolt. I love the way Joanna Carter, who’s written successfully in both literary forms, described the difference between short stories and novels at one of Bristol’s Novel Nights last summer: ‘A short story is a skeleton bursting from the closet. It’s raw, a moment of truth. A novel has to put flesh on those bones.’
Both relevant, both exciting. Do you prefer writing short stories or novels? Do you find either one more challenging to write?
4 thoughts on “Size Matters: Short Stories vs. Novels”
I like reading both formats, but I like writing short stories more. While both require a strong hook to bring the reader in and keep him there, I like the challenge of packing in a novel’s worth of content into a limited space. It requires that extra punch. And while you can have a cast of characters, short stories require you focus on who’s most important.
Short stories may not be as popular as novels, but I like them.
I agree that the short story is more challenging. It’s truly an art form, and so fulfilling when I finish one to my satisfaction (maybe half or two-thirds of the time; not all ideas work out).
I think this is a great topic for discussion. I’m fascinated by the psychological reasons we read (and write) fiction and have a pet theory that there is something fundamentally different in the psychological rewards of reading long and short fiction. Certainly as a writer I find writing novels very emotionally and psychologically rewarding partly because of the amount of time I get to spend with my characters but also because they have the chance to evolve. On the other hand, short stories can be powerfully unsettling (a positive!) in a way which is harder to sustain in a novel. What do you think?
I agree, the short story has a sharper edge. But the power of writing has to be strong too, and that’s where I feel it’s quite difficult. I think a message from a short story lingers longer, and characters from novels are more unforgettable. There’s certainly a lot to explore about the craft behind each form.